In The Pass

Christian Libertarian Oriented Commentary on Current Events

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

McCainia

Says John:
"It shows one thing: I'm the conservative leader who can unite the party," McCain told The Associated Press after easing past former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney for his first-ever triumph in a primary open only to Republicans.

Uniting the party with 36% of the vote? OK?
"Conservative Issues:
Immigration? Wrong - wants "amnesty" by another name.
Free Speech? Wrong - McCain - Feingold anti political speech law.
Gun Control? Wrong - Likes the "assault weapons ban", "Saturday night special" bans, and laws requiring "smart gun locks" None of which have ANY beneficial results and have no place in a "conservative" platform.
Taxes? Wrong - Voted against the "Bush tax cuts" multiple times.
Life? Wrong - Supports federal funding of embryonic stem cell research - unlike all of the other republican candidates.
Life? Wrong - Does not support the repeal of "Roe v Wade" because: "I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade, which would then force women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.” Even the pro-abortion legal experts recognize the it is bad law, so at least support it for that!

Conservatives used to have a term for elected Republicans who did not represent the "conservative" aspects of the Party: RINO Republican in Name Only. So what do we call a conservative in name only? I suspect that in any head to head competition against either Obama or Clinton, given the similarity of their views on just about everything; that the name would be LOSER.

So if you are going to lose anyway? Why not vote for the candidates who appeal to at least a portion of your platform?

Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Give them what they want?

The problem is that even if you wanted to give "them" what they want, their wants often, (and must eventually), exceed your ability to give. Consider Kendel Williams of Orlando, who died because his car had a manual transmission instead of an automatic.
Neither of the men knew how to drive the car because it had a stick shift and instead shot the man, Marchione said.

Even life becomes cheap when everything else is free.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Guns Versus Paper

California Dreaming:
On the day of her husband's release, Thomas-Harris spent about 45 minutes with prosecutors and begged for "a piece of paper" that would shield her, Booth said. Prosecutors tried to get her an emergency protective order, but Lindars was on vacation in Oregon and wasn't expected back for two weeks.

Unlike the game of Rock, Paper Scissors; paper provides no protection. The issue is absurd on it's face. A protection order is a piece of paper with words on it. Nothing more. The paper has value only to those who are inclined to obey the law. Even if she had received that piece of paper, the police were minutes away when seconds counted. What are the odds that the man with malice aforethought would wait for the police? Yeah. Right.

Now there is one more victim of anti-gun policies. When will they realize that anti-gun policies are literal death to the defenseless?

I'm not holding my breath.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

Evangelicals are Easy


Evangelicals are easy

As much as I love the Evangelical Blogs and Columnists, the ease to which they fall for pick up lines is scary. Janet Folger, “FAITH2ACTION” on WND sums up the reasons to support Huckabee (Chuck Norris? his reasons aren’t
any more sound.):

“The only top-tier guy we can count on to stand for a Human Life and Marriage Amendment.”
We all know that human life is the code phrase for abortion and embryonic stem cell research (abortion). There is no movement on these issues at all right now, and not just because Bush is against them. Abortion is a legal minefield and with the exception of Supreme Court Nominees, PresidentHuckabee would have no more power than Citizen Huckabee. Stem cells might actually be an issue, though the science on this is rapidly turning. No one, not even Huckabee is advocating a ban on embryonic stem cell research, only on the federal funding of it. In that, he is no different that others in the field. So with regard to Life Issues, I’ve read nothing to indicate that the Huckabee would be any better than any other “republican” running, and a lot to indicate that he would be worse. Despite being a good idea, the marriage amendment is not going to happen. And even if it would, the president has NO role in approving it. Reference the following from usconstitution.net on the 4 ways that an amendment to the constitution is ratified:

Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state conventions (never used)
Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state legislatures (never used)
Proposal by Congress, ratification by state conventions (used once)
Proposal by Congress, ratification by state legislatures (used all other times)

Aside from the fact that these two issues are going nowhere; what about other issues? What about:

Taxes, *not good – he raised them and can’t explain clearly without being apologetic or blaming the courts, (which puts him on par with what Romney did for same sex unions). Everybody says that they will lower taxes, so no real differentiation there. And his “great” idea for new “fair tax” is DOA in any legislature, but especially in one controlled by social demorats.

Education and Arts *not good – he wants to spend more money just like he did in AR. (This is the apologetic part where he says that education is a good thing...)

Energy Independence *not good – no mention of drilling in AK or the continental shelf, just exploration. We already have China drilling off the coast of Florida and doesn’t have the gravitas to advocate drilling where we already know there is oil. Lots of mention of conservation and alternative energy – sounds like a Democrat.

HealthCare *not good – He wants a nationalized children’s health care - got that. We have already seen where the SCHIP is already used and the markedly growing percentage of enrollees that are NOT children. This is nothing but nationalized health care incrementalism – as it is under Bush. And he advocates a national smoking ban? Don’t get me started on private property rights.

Agriculture
*not good – more money yet again.

Huckabee is a big government populist. He couches his ideas in the realm of Christian-speak and Compassion (just like GW), and pitches the government law or program to give you what you want. The problem is that – as Reagan is famous for saying, Government that is big enough to give you what you want, is big enough to take everything you have. Or in the words of Rush Limbaugh: We got what it takes to takes what you gots…

The same political philosophy that allows you to spend other people’s money on healthcare, arts, education, and livelihood; is the same political philosophy that allows you to use that same power to take faith out of schools, engage in confiscatory tax policies that discourage economic growth, make you pay for someone else’s abortion or self-destructive lifestyle. It is the same philosophy that has the government breaking in your door to take your child because they disagree with your health care decisions, ignoring your right to school your children as you choose, and violating your rights to self defense and firearms. All in the name of public good.

Mike Huckabee’s platform is a study in contradictions, but only because he is basically advocating the pro-life democrat position of a few years back. Aside from the gun control position, I have a very hard time differentiating his positions from Sen. Harry Reid of NV. He is nothing but a Christian liberal socialist running on a feel good platform. And the Evangelical Right has for the most part, fallen for it.

Evangelicals are easy. Pity they don't make a morning after pill for political office elections.

Powered by ScribeFire.